[aur-general] Tarball Guidelines
lists at baums-on-web.de
Mon Dec 6 18:56:13 CET 2010
Am Mon, 6 Dec 2010 17:35:33 +0100
schrieb Thorsten Töpper <atsutane at freethoughts.de>:
> > I'm pretty sure binaries originally referred to executables and
> > libraries (which are in fact executables). My proposal is to change
> > this sentence accordingly. Either use "ABSOLUTELY no executables" or
> > "ABSOLUTELY no binaries except for icons."
> > Also it should be mentioned in Arch Packaging Standards.
> > opinions?
> Hm yes that sounds far more elegant than the proposal I wrote this
> morning and sent just a couple of minutes ago.
In Arch Packaging Standards? Arch binary packages without binaries?
I think it's sufficient to keep it in the AUR guidelines as Dave
mentioned because this affects only AUR, not the repos.
More information about the aur-general