[aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining?
djszapi at archlinux.us
Wed Feb 3 10:53:53 EST 2010
2010/2/3 Angel Velásquez <angvp at archlinux.com.ve>:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Chris Brannon <cmbrannon79 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thomas Bächler wrote:
>>> I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position
>>> instead of calling it "Semi-TU".
>> This is a fine idea, and I see no harm in it.
> Im in favour of this, my unique concern is about how hard will be
> creating another level of permission in the AUR,
It's not so long so obviously ...
> and some rules about,
> if a semi-tu can orphan packages from TUs or TU-Dev, figuring out that
> part, and assuming that will have an approbation, we will start
> writting patches, so this can be a "slow" process, (2 months or so if
> it's aproved? plus the time of discussion?).
Uhm.. what.. really ? 2 monthes for you ?
More information about the aur-general