[aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining?

[Thomas Bächler]

Am 03.02.2010 16:44, schrieb Angel Velásquez:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Florian Friesdorf <flo at chaoflow.net> wrote:
>> I'd give an AUR moderator all permissions to mess around in the AUR, be
>> it packages of TUs or not. If somebody messes up, he/she can be punished
>> later.

Agreed. They should be responsible enough to not do any bullshit.

> Well, other question
> how will be the process of selection of these semi-tu ?

Application, vote, done. It shouldn't be that complicated.

> how will be
> called the group semi-tu ? trusted but not at all?

I'd simply say "AUR Moderators". We have moderators on the forum, and on
the wiki, so having them on the AUR makes sense - it is in fact a bit
late, the AUR is too much anarchy for my taste.


I'd suggest so start the process by just voting upon Lex and if (s)he
(sorry, can't determine the sex from that name, my stupidity) is
approved, one will see how it goes and if it's a good idea. Then one can
think about adding more moderators or not. Just KISS.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20100203/b1cff2f1/attachment.bin>