[aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining?
flo at chaoflow.net
Wed Feb 3 11:06:53 EST 2010
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:44:19PM -0300, Angel Velásquez wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Florian Friesdorf <flo at chaoflow.net> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:31:37PM -0300, Angel Velásquez wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Chris Brannon <cmbrannon79 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Thomas Bächler wrote:
> >> Im in favour of this, my unique concern is about how hard will be
> >> creating another level of permission in the AUR, and some rules about,
> >> if a semi-tu can orphan packages from TUs or TU-Dev, figuring out that
> >> part, and assuming that will have an approbation, we will start
> >> writting patches, so this can be a "slow" process, (2 months or so if
> >> it's aproved? plus the time of discussion?).
> > I'd give an AUR moderator all permissions to mess around in the AUR, be
> > it packages of TUs or not. If somebody messes up, he/she can be punished
> > later.
> Lol no punishment! I don't wanna hit anybody!;
;) still - I don't see the advantages of too restrictive rules.
Let's start answering the questions - her my suggestions:
> Well, other question how will be the process of selection of these
- (self-)proposal on this list with short personal description.
- 10 people in favour: et voila
- one opposing: AUR-TUs vote about it
- less than ten AUR-TUs: TU's vote along the AUR-TUs
> how will be called the group semi-tu ? trusted but not at all?
AUR-TUs - trusted user of the AUR
> there are many many questions until we can make this idea possible.
> Just that.
Let's get going :)
Florian Friesdorf <flo at chaoflow.net>
GPG FPR: EA5C F2B4 FBBB BA65 3DCD E8ED 82A1 6522 4A1F 4367
Jabber/XMPP: flo at chaoflow.net
OTR FPR: 9E191746 213321FE C896B37D 24B118C0 31785700
IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the aur-general