[aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining?

Angel Velásquez angvp at archlinux.com.ve
Wed Feb 3 10:44:19 EST 2010

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Florian Friesdorf <flo at chaoflow.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:31:37PM -0300, Angel Velásquez wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Chris Brannon <cmbrannon79 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> >> I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position
>> >> instead of calling it "Semi-TU".
>> >
>> > This is a fine idea, and I see no harm in it.
>> Im in favour of this, my unique concern is about how hard will be
>> creating another level of permission in the AUR, and some rules about,
>> if a semi-tu can orphan packages from TUs or TU-Dev, figuring out that
>> part, and assuming that will have an approbation, we will start
>> writting patches, so this can be a "slow" process, (2 months or so if
>> it's aproved? plus the time of discussion?).
> I'd give an AUR moderator all permissions to mess around in the AUR, be
> it packages of TUs or not. If somebody messes up, he/she can be punished
> later.

Lol no punishment! I don't wanna hit anybody!; Well, other question
how will be the process of selection of these semi-tu ? how will be
called the group semi-tu ? trusted but not at all? there are many many
questions until we can make this idea possible. Just that.

> --
> Florian Friesdorf <flo at chaoflow.net>
>  GPG FPR: EA5C F2B4 FBBB BA65 3DCD  E8ED 82A1 6522 4A1F 4367
> Jabber/XMPP: flo at chaoflow.net
>  OTR FPR: 9E191746 213321FE C896B37D 24B118C0 31785700
> IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC

Angel Velásquez
angvp @ irc.freenode.net
Arch Linux Trusted User
Linux Counter: #359909

More information about the aur-general mailing list