[aur-general] kdeplasma-addons-applets-daisy: unmaintained duplicate, can probably go.

[Ray Rashif]

On 14 June 2010 22:43, Peter Lewis <pete at muddygoat.org> wrote:
> On Monday 14 Jun 2010 at 17:23 Ray Rashif wrote:
>> On 14 June 2010 14:00, Peter Lewis <pete at muddygoat.org> wrote:
>> > kdeplasma-addons-applets-daisy
>> > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31392
>> >
>> > is unmaintained and duplicates
>> >
>> > plasma-daisy-plasmoid
>> > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25203
>> >
>> > so can probably be safely deleted.
>> >
>> > Incidentally, is there any naming convention for KDE plasmoid packages? A
>> > quick search reveals a whole range of approaches:
>> >
>> > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?O=0&K=plasm&do_Search=Go
>> >
>> > Appending -plasmoid seems the most popular, but having kdeplasma-addons
>> > or something simliar at the start of the package name also seems
>> > sensible.
>> >
>> >From [ http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=plasma ]:
>> kdeplasma-addons-applets-${plasmoid}
>>
>> Since the one following the naming convention is unmaintained, I would
>> suggest adopting it with the contents of the other one. But I have no
>> problem with deleting it, since it meets most of the criteria for
>> removal.
>
> Sounds sensible - I'm happy to adopt the unmaintained one, but I notice that
> Bram Schoenmakers is maintaining the other version so should have first
> refusal.

Yes, it would be up to Bram. He could either:

1) keep on maintaining current package
2) disown current package and adopt the orphan
3) disown current package and let someone else (you) adopt the orphan


--
GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD