[aur-general] Removal package request

[Loui Chang]

On Wed 10 Mar 2010 10:45 +0100, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> On 10 March 2010 10:37, Daniel Isenmann <daniel.isenmann at gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> > -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> >> Datum: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:33:41 -0600
> >> Von: "Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)" <ghost1227 at archlinux.us>
> >> An: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" <aur-general at archlinux.org>
> >> Betreff: Re: [aur-general] Removal package request
> >
> >> On 03/10/10 at 08:46am, Daniel Isenmann wrote:
> >> > Am 10.03.2010 08:41, schrieb Lukáš Jirkovský:
> >> > >This following package does nothing. Or actually it does – it takes a
> >> > >lot of space (1GB).
> >> > >
> >> > >http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35338
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > Done. Totally useless package.
> >> Now i'm really curious... what was it?
> >> --
> >
> > It was a package with an 1GB included "patch" file. But the so called "patch" wasn't in text form, it was something in binary form. Maybe we were misused as file hoster or somebody just tested something.
> > --
> > Sicherer, schneller und einfacher. Die aktuellen Internet-Browser -
> > jetzt kostenlos herunterladen! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/atbrowser
> >
> 
> When it first appeared (it was yesterday) it was empty PKGBUILD with
> description "I'm not trollin" and foo.patch which had 256MB. The patch
> seemed to be an empty file (like dd if=/dev/zero of=file). I thought
> the uploader will ask for deletion soon but I didn't see anyone asking
> for deletion of the package so I checked it on the AUR. It was there
> but the patch had 1GB! So I asked for deletion myself.

I could have sworn we had a file size cap on there.
I'll have to look into that. Thanks for the notice.