[aur-general] Question about bad applications

[Gary Wright]

On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Nathan O <ndowens.aur at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 5:31 AM, PyroPeter <abi1789 at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 09/01/2010 07:36 PM, PyroPeter wrote:
> >
> >> I now managed to find the developers eMail-address and take a
> >> look on the code. what exactly is buggy about izulu?
> >> (Apart from beeing provided as deb-packet only)
> >>
> >> About your PKGBUILD:
> >> 1. Maintainer-comment missing
> >> 2. Not all depends listed:
> >> The deb depends on: wget, xmlstarlet, imagemagick, xml-twig-tools
> >> Suggested: libnotify-bin
> >> 3. Try to keep your PKGBUILDs readable (proper indention)
> >>
> >> Regards, PyroPeter
> >>
> >
> > Izulu is now available as tarball[0].
> > With it comes a README containing the dependencies and the developers
> > e-mail-address for further questions. Your PKGBUILD is still not
> > indented properly, and the dependencies are incomplete.
> >
> > Regards, PyroPeter
> >
> > [0]
> >
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/izulu/files/izulu-0.2.5.3.tar.gz/download
> >
> > --
> > freenode/pyropeter                          "12:50 - Ich drücke Return."
> >
> It is now fixed, some how I guess I didn't notice the tar.gz files
>

They weren't there before.  I was going to mess around with it, but then I
saw that they only had .debs posted on their sourceforge page, I winced and
thought about how much I hate working with .debs when not on a Debian
system.

Maybe PyroPeter sent the developer an email requesting the tarballs get
posted to the SF page?