[aur-general] Question about bad applications
Nathan O
ndowens.aur at gmail.com
Sat Sep 4 14:32:34 EDT 2010
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Gary Wright <wriggary at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Nathan O <ndowens.aur at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 5:31 AM, PyroPeter <abi1789 at googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On 09/01/2010 07:36 PM, PyroPeter wrote:
> > >
> > >> I now managed to find the developers eMail-address and take a
> > >> look on the code. what exactly is buggy about izulu?
> > >> (Apart from beeing provided as deb-packet only)
> > >>
> > >> About your PKGBUILD:
> > >> 1. Maintainer-comment missing
> > >> 2. Not all depends listed:
> > >> The deb depends on: wget, xmlstarlet, imagemagick, xml-twig-tools
> > >> Suggested: libnotify-bin
> > >> 3. Try to keep your PKGBUILDs readable (proper indention)
> > >>
> > >> Regards, PyroPeter
> > >>
> > >
> > > Izulu is now available as tarball[0].
> > > With it comes a README containing the dependencies and the developers
> > > e-mail-address for further questions. Your PKGBUILD is still not
> > > indented properly, and the dependencies are incomplete.
> > >
> > > Regards, PyroPeter
> > >
> > > [0]
> > >
> >
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/izulu/files/izulu-0.2.5.3.tar.gz/download
> > >
> > > --
> > > freenode/pyropeter "12:50 - Ich drücke
> Return."
> > >
> > It is now fixed, some how I guess I didn't notice the tar.gz files
> >
>
> They weren't there before. I was going to mess around with it, but then I
> saw that they only had .debs posted on their sourceforge page, I winced and
> thought about how much I hate working with .debs when not on a Debian
> system.
>
> Maybe PyroPeter sent the developer an email requesting the tarballs get
> posted to the SF page?
>
Or I just updated the PKGBUILD and only checked the page for a newer version
and left it as a deb file, woops :)
More information about the aur-general
mailing list