[aur-general] The Arch Way

[Christoph]

On Friday, 10 September 2010, 17:40:35 Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> It looks like in this case the content of the portable zip is identicaly
> (just about) to the content of the deb, just that the debs are
> arch-specific. 

That describes the situation very well. Moreover, the debs contain a .desktop 
and a .png file, whereas the zip file does not, and the zip version looks for 
the configuration file in some sub-sub-subfolder, not in /etc.

Christoph