[aur-general] The Arch Way

[Ulf Winkelvos]

On 10.09.2010 19:07, Christoph wrote:
> On Friday, 10 September 2010, 17:40:35 Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
>> It looks like in this case the content of the portable zip is identicaly
>> (just about) to the content of the deb, just that the debs are
>> arch-specific.
>
> That describes the situation very well. Moreover, the debs contain a .desktop
> and a .png file, whereas the zip file does not, and the zip version looks for
> the configuration file in some sub-sub-subfolder, not in /etc.
>
> Christoph
>
You should consider option 4, like Philipp suggested, until then i don't 
see how option 2 should be any better than option 3.

Ulf