[aur-general] The Arch Way
ngoonee at gmail.com
Fri Sep 10 15:59:47 EDT 2010
On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 19:22 +0200, Ulf Winkelvos wrote:
> On 10.09.2010 19:07, Christoph wrote:
> > On Friday, 10 September 2010, 17:40:35 Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> >> It looks like in this case the content of the portable zip is identicaly
> >> (just about) to the content of the deb, just that the debs are
> >> arch-specific.
> > That describes the situation very well. Moreover, the debs contain a .desktop
> > and a .png file, whereas the zip file does not, and the zip version looks for
> > the configuration file in some sub-sub-subfolder, not in /etc.
> > Christoph
> You should consider option 4, like Philipp suggested, until then i don't
> see how option 2 should be any better than option 3.
You mean besides the fact that 'debs are evil-er than zips'?
Something about that 'data' folder is really bad =)
More information about the aur-general