[aur-general] AUR cleanup (was: Removal request (aurdupes output 2010-09-15))
Heiko Baums
lists at baums-on-web.de
Wed Sep 22 09:02:51 EDT 2010
Am Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:26:07 +0200
schrieb Jakob Gruber <jakob.gruber at gmail.com>:
> I'd suggest waiting a week or 2 to give people a chance to look over
> these lists and raise objections. Afterwards we could either orphan
> these packages in the DB itself (if our admins agree) or start going
> through these packages manually.
>
> Any ideas? Objections?
ttf-alee
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6264
ttf-baekmuk
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6266
ttf-castlequeen
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18556
ttf-computer-modern-fonts
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2100
ttf-ffftusj
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18567
ttf-garagesh
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8097
ttf-gill-sans
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18570
ttf-halftone
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17721
These fonts are all up-to-date and downloadable. So they should be kept
in AUR.
ttf-okolaks
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22494
ttf-aefonts
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13692
These fonts are not available anymore. So they can be removed.
dd_rescue
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=447
ttf-essays
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11115
These packages are just out-of-date in AUR. Upstream is still active.
So these packages should be kept in AUR and orphaned if the usual
requirements are fulfilled.
Heiko
More information about the aur-general
mailing list