[aur-general] aurdupes 0.6 released

Stefan Husmann stefan-husmann at t-online.de
Mon Aug 29 09:20:04 EDT 2011

Am 29.08.2011 13:13, schrieb gadget3000:
> *Packages created to update others:*
> dar-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51785) wanted to
> update dar [community] more quickly. It has been abandonded and only has 1
> vote.
> deja-dup-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35144) has similar
> intentions for deja-dup (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28835). I
> have just flagged deja-dup as out of date.
> evilvte-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51769) had similar
> intentions for evilvte (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16727) and
> has since been abandoned. It has no votes.
> extcalc-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36578) has similar
> intentions for extcalc (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22084),
> which was a year out of date at the time of extcalc-new's creation.
> flashrom-svn-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45519) had
> similar intentions for flashrom-svn (
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23390). It has since been
> abandoned and may have even been deleted before.
> fmit-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51160) had similar
> intentions but the maintainer want's it deleted.
> gabedit-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47301) had similar
> intentions for gabedit (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34230) but
> is now itself out of date. It has no votes.
> gtkglarea-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31353) had
> similar intentions for gtkglarea (
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=901). It has since been abandoned.

Most were deleted. Some were not yet, because I wrote a comment and want to give a chance to read them to the the maintainer.

Thank you for your efforts.

More information about the aur-general mailing list