[aur-general] aurdupes 0.6 released

gadget3000 gadget3000 at msn.com
Mon Aug 29 15:46:17 EDT 2011

*Packages created to update others:*
haskell-xmpp-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32418) was
created to update haskell-xmpp (
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30218) more quickly. The
maintainer is happy for it to be deleted, as stated in the comments.
hdate-applet-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42660) was
created to update hdate-applet (
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4353) more quickly (I presume). It
currently has no votes or maintainer.
hspell-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44608) presumably
had similar intentions for hspell [extra]. It currently has no votes or
pyblosxom-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35982) presumably
had similar intentions for pyblosxom (
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17253) and is maintained by
an inactive maintainer so it has old dependencies that haven't worked since
at least Oct 2010.
stardict-ncce-ce-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40850) I
think was created to fix the source links of stardict-ncce-ce (
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19437) after the project was
removed from sourceforge. It currently has no maintainer or votes and
stardict-ncce-ce is also orphaned.
stardict-ncce-ec-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40851) did
the same thing for stardict-ncce-ec (
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19438). It also is orphaned and
has no votes and stardict-ncce-ec is also orphaned.

*Packages created for other reasons:*
idjc-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35076) is poorly
named and should be called idjc-git
lazarus-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26708) is poorly
named and should be called lazarus-svn, which already exists (
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18729) but is orphaned.
reciteword-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41925) was created
to fix the PKGBUILD of pyblosxom (
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17253), which is currently
spideroak-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47096) is poorly
named and should be called spideroak-beta. It is actively maintained.
xf86-video-intel-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22968) is
poorly named and should probably be called xf86-video-intel-alpha. I'm not
sure what is the norm around alpha packages so please let me know what
happens with this one.
yaffs2utils-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46674) is
poorly named and should be called yaffs2utils-snapshot but it's maintained
by someone with an @archlinux email address so I think I'm mistaken on this
one. Let me know what you think.

*Awaiting maintainer responses:*
ipset-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49724)
john-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38152)
josm-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13569)
metslib-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43739)

And that's the current, whole list processed!


On 29 August 2011 14:20, Stefan Husmann <stefan-husmann at t-online.de> wrote:

> Am 29.08.2011 13:13, schrieb gadget3000:
>  *Packages created to update others:*
>> dar-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=51785<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51785>)
>> wanted to
>> update dar [community] more quickly. It has been abandonded and only has 1
>> vote.
>> deja-dup-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=35144<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35144>)
>> has similar
>> intentions for deja-dup (https://aur.archlinux.org/**
>> packages.php?ID=28835 <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28835>).
>> I
>> have just flagged deja-dup as out of date.
>> evilvte-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=51769<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51769>)
>> had similar
>> intentions for evilvte (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=16727<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16727>)
>> and
>> has since been abandoned. It has no votes.
>> extcalc-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=36578<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36578>)
>> has similar
>> intentions for extcalc (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=22084<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22084>
>> ),
>> which was a year out of date at the time of extcalc-new's creation.
>> flashrom-svn-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=45519<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45519>)
>> had
>> similar intentions for flashrom-svn (
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=23390<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23390>).
>> It has since been
>> abandoned and may have even been deleted before.
>> fmit-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=51160<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51160>)
>> had similar
>> intentions but the maintainer want's it deleted.
>> gabedit-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=47301<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47301>)
>> had similar
>> intentions for gabedit (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=34230<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34230>)
>> but
>> is now itself out of date. It has no votes.
>> gtkglarea-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=31353<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31353>)
>> had
>> similar intentions for gtkglarea (
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=901<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=901>).
>> It has since been abandoned.
> Most were deleted. Some were not yet, because I wrote a comment and want to
> give a chance to read them to the the maintainer.
> Thank you for your efforts.

More information about the aur-general mailing list