[aur-general] aurdupes 0.6 released

[gadget3000]

john-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38152) was created to
either update [community] or include a patch which is now included in
[community] anyway. It's just been orphaned.

Gadget3000



On 29 August 2011 20:46, gadget3000 <gadget3000 at msn.com> wrote:

> *Packages created to update others:*
> haskell-xmpp-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32418) was
> created to update haskell-xmpp (
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30218) more quickly. The
> maintainer is happy for it to be deleted, as stated in the comments.
> hdate-applet-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42660) was
> created to update hdate-applet (
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4353) more quickly (I presume).
> It currently has no votes or maintainer.
> hspell-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44608) presumably
> had similar intentions for hspell [extra]. It currently has no votes or
> maintainer.
> pyblosxom-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35982) presumably
> had similar intentions for pyblosxom (
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17253) and is maintained by
> an inactive maintainer so it has old dependencies that haven't worked since
> at least Oct 2010.
> stardict-ncce-ce-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40850) I
> think was created to fix the source links of stardict-ncce-ce (
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19437) after the project was
> removed from sourceforge. It currently has no maintainer or votes and
> stardict-ncce-ce is also orphaned.
> stardict-ncce-ec-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40851) did
> the same thing for stardict-ncce-ec (
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19438). It also is orphaned and
> has no votes and stardict-ncce-ec is also orphaned.
>
> *Packages created for other reasons:*
> idjc-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35076) is poorly
> named and should be called idjc-git
> lazarus-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26708) is poorly
> named and should be called lazarus-svn, which already exists (
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18729) but is orphaned.
> reciteword-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41925) was
> created to fix the PKGBUILD of pyblosxom (
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17253), which is currently
> orphaned.
> spideroak-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47096) is
> poorly named and should be called spideroak-beta. It is actively maintained.
> xf86-video-intel-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22968)
> is poorly named and should probably be called xf86-video-intel-alpha. I'm
> not sure what is the norm around alpha packages so please let me know what
> happens with this one.
> yaffs2utils-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46674) is
> poorly named and should be called yaffs2utils-snapshot but it's maintained
> by someone with an @archlinux email address so I think I'm mistaken on this
> one. Let me know what you think.
>
> *Awaiting maintainer responses:*
> ipset-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49724)
> john-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38152)
> josm-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13569)
> metslib-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43739)
>
>
> And that's the current, whole list processed!
>
> Gadget3000
>
>
> On 29 August 2011 14:20, Stefan Husmann <stefan-husmann at t-online.de>wrote:
>
>> Am 29.08.2011 13:13, schrieb gadget3000:
>>
>>  *Packages created to update others:*
>>> dar-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=51785<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51785>)
>>> wanted to
>>> update dar [community] more quickly. It has been abandonded and only has
>>> 1
>>> vote.
>>> deja-dup-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=35144<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35144>)
>>> has similar
>>> intentions for deja-dup (https://aur.archlinux.org/**
>>> packages.php?ID=28835 <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28835>).
>>> I
>>> have just flagged deja-dup as out of date.
>>> evilvte-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=51769<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51769>)
>>> had similar
>>> intentions for evilvte (https://aur.archlinux.org/**
>>> packages.php?ID=16727 <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16727>)
>>> and
>>> has since been abandoned. It has no votes.
>>> extcalc-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=36578<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36578>)
>>> has similar
>>> intentions for extcalc (https://aur.archlinux.org/**
>>> packages.php?ID=22084 <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22084>
>>> ),
>>> which was a year out of date at the time of extcalc-new's creation.
>>> flashrom-svn-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=45519<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45519>)
>>> had
>>> similar intentions for flashrom-svn (
>>> https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=23390<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23390>).
>>> It has since been
>>> abandoned and may have even been deleted before.
>>> fmit-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=51160<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51160>)
>>> had similar
>>> intentions but the maintainer want's it deleted.
>>> gabedit-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=47301<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47301>)
>>> had similar
>>> intentions for gabedit (https://aur.archlinux.org/**
>>> packages.php?ID=34230 <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34230>)
>>> but
>>> is now itself out of date. It has no votes.
>>> gtkglarea-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=31353<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31353>)
>>> had
>>> similar intentions for gtkglarea (
>>> https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=901<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=901>).
>>> It has since been abandoned.
>>>
>>>
>> Most were deleted. Some were not yet, because I wrote a comment and want
>> to give a chance to read them to the the maintainer.
>>
>> Thank you for your efforts.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>