[aur-general] aurdupes 0.6 released

gadget3000 gadget3000 at msn.com
Tue Aug 30 06:09:25 EDT 2011


ipset-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49724) was created to
update ipset (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16553). The
maintainer is happy for it to be removed (see comments).


Gadget3000



On 30 August 2011 09:56, gadget3000 <gadget3000 at msn.com> wrote:

> john-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38152) was created
> to either update [community] or include a patch which is now included in
> [community] anyway. It's just been orphaned.
>
> Gadget3000
>
>
>
> On 29 August 2011 20:46, gadget3000 <gadget3000 at msn.com> wrote:
>
>> *Packages created to update others:*
>> haskell-xmpp-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32418) was
>> created to update haskell-xmpp (
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30218) more quickly. The
>> maintainer is happy for it to be deleted, as stated in the comments.
>> hdate-applet-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42660) was
>> created to update hdate-applet (
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4353) more quickly (I presume).
>> It currently has no votes or maintainer.
>>  hspell-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44608)
>> presumably had similar intentions for hspell [extra]. It currently has no
>> votes or maintainer.
>> pyblosxom-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35982)
>> presumably had similar intentions for pyblosxom (
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17253) and is maintained by
>> an inactive maintainer so it has old dependencies that haven't worked since
>> at least Oct 2010.
>> stardict-ncce-ce-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40850) I
>> think was created to fix the source links of stardict-ncce-ce (
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19437) after the project was
>> removed from sourceforge. It currently has no maintainer or votes and
>> stardict-ncce-ce is also orphaned.
>> stardict-ncce-ec-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40851)
>> did the same thing for stardict-ncce-ec (
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19438). It also is orphaned and
>> has no votes and stardict-ncce-ec is also orphaned.
>>
>> *Packages created for other reasons:*
>> idjc-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35076) is poorly
>> named and should be called idjc-git
>> lazarus-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26708) is
>> poorly named and should be called lazarus-svn, which already exists (
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18729) but is orphaned.
>> reciteword-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41925) was
>> created to fix the PKGBUILD of pyblosxom (
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17253), which is currently
>> orphaned.
>>  spideroak-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47096) is
>> poorly named and should be called spideroak-beta. It is actively maintained.
>> xf86-video-intel-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22968)
>> is poorly named and should probably be called xf86-video-intel-alpha. I'm
>> not sure what is the norm around alpha packages so please let me know what
>> happens with this one.
>>  yaffs2utils-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46674) is
>> poorly named and should be called yaffs2utils-snapshot but it's maintained
>> by someone with an @archlinux email address so I think I'm mistaken on this
>> one. Let me know what you think.
>>
>> *Awaiting maintainer responses:*
>> ipset-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49724)
>> john-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38152)
>> josm-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13569)
>> metslib-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43739)
>>
>>
>> And that's the current, whole list processed!
>>
>> Gadget3000
>>
>>
>> On 29 August 2011 14:20, Stefan Husmann <stefan-husmann at t-online.de>wrote:
>>
>>> Am 29.08.2011 13:13, schrieb gadget3000:
>>>
>>>  *Packages created to update others:*
>>>> dar-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=51785<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51785>)
>>>> wanted to
>>>> update dar [community] more quickly. It has been abandonded and only has
>>>> 1
>>>> vote.
>>>> deja-dup-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=35144<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35144>)
>>>> has similar
>>>> intentions for deja-dup (https://aur.archlinux.org/**
>>>> packages.php?ID=28835 <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28835>).
>>>> I
>>>> have just flagged deja-dup as out of date.
>>>> evilvte-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=51769<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51769>)
>>>> had similar
>>>> intentions for evilvte (https://aur.archlinux.org/**
>>>> packages.php?ID=16727 <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16727>)
>>>> and
>>>> has since been abandoned. It has no votes.
>>>> extcalc-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=36578<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36578>)
>>>> has similar
>>>> intentions for extcalc (https://aur.archlinux.org/**
>>>> packages.php?ID=22084 <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22084>
>>>> ),
>>>> which was a year out of date at the time of extcalc-new's creation.
>>>> flashrom-svn-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=45519<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45519>)
>>>> had
>>>> similar intentions for flashrom-svn (
>>>> https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=23390<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23390>).
>>>> It has since been
>>>> abandoned and may have even been deleted before.
>>>> fmit-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=51160<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51160>)
>>>> had similar
>>>> intentions but the maintainer want's it deleted.
>>>> gabedit-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=47301<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47301>)
>>>> had similar
>>>> intentions for gabedit (https://aur.archlinux.org/**
>>>> packages.php?ID=34230 <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34230>)
>>>> but
>>>> is now itself out of date. It has no votes.
>>>> gtkglarea-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=31353<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31353>)
>>>> had
>>>> similar intentions for gtkglarea (
>>>> https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=901<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=901>).
>>>> It has since been abandoned.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Most were deleted. Some were not yet, because I wrote a comment and want
>>> to give a chance to read them to the the maintainer.
>>>
>>> Thank you for your efforts.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>


More information about the aur-general mailing list