[aur-general] Removal request (nerolinux3)

Edoardo Maria Elidoro edoardo.elidoro at gmail.com
Wed Dec 28 14:18:52 EST 2011


So, let me understand...
In AUR we should keep older version if they're from a branch different than
the last one (like keeping Firefox 7 when version 8 is released - just an
example)?
Or we're doing this just for commercial software?

2011/12/28 Seblu <seblu at seblu.net>

> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Edoardo Maria Elidoro
> <edoardo.elidoro at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > the package nerolinux3 (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30591)
> is
> > the orphan and out-of-date version of nerolinux (
> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2153).
> >
> > I think it should be removed.
> >
> It's the last of the 3.x branch. Package is nammed nerolinux3 (as its
> branch) and i don't know why was marked out-of-date.
>
> http://unix.oppserver.net/nero/
>
> --
> Sébastien Luttringer
> www.seblu.net
>



-- 
*If you stand for nothing you'll fall for anything.*
ArchLinux and Gnome Shell user // Linux and Free Software believer // LugCR
member.
eduardo on wiki.archlinux.org // edoardo on aur.archlinux.org // Eduardo
Elidoro on FB


More information about the aur-general mailing list