[aur-general] replying-on-thread issues (was AUR & Copyright)

Nicky726 nicky726 at gmail.com
Mon Feb 7 17:13:53 EST 2011

Dne Po 7. února 2011 16:31:22 Ng Oon-Ee napsal(a):
> On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 14:03 +0000, Magnus Therning wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 13:49, Nicky726 <nicky726 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Could that be that I get Arch's mailing lists as diggests and reply to
> > > them in the client and copy the subject of the particular message. Am
> > > I supposed to do it in a different way? (Possibly with keeping the
> > > messages delivered in a digest, not every separetely).
> > > Now as this is a reply to a directly delivered message, it should fit
> > > correctly. I didn't touch the subject field in this case at all.
> > > Btw, thax you're trying to debug my issues.
> > 
> > I don't usually subscribe in digest-mode, but I vaguely recall that
> > there's a setting to get the digest in the form where each message is
> > a MIME attachment to the digest message (if that makes sense).  When I
> > did that then my MUA, mutt, could open each attachment as an email and
> > I could reply from that view, which resulted in the correct
> > In-Reply-To and In-Relation-To values.  I'm not a user of KMail myself
> > so you'll have to experiment with it to see if it behaves the same way
> > as mutt  ;-)
> > 
> > /M
> On other MLs I'm on the general perception is that if you plan to reply,
> please don't use digests. In other words, digest subscriptions should be
> considered 'read-only', precisely because of the thread-breaking
> behaviour.
> Magnus' solution sounds nifty though, if you can get it working.

Lets see now, if I got it working, KMail displays encapsulated messages and 
now I replied directly to yours.

Don't it always seem to go
That you don't know what you've got
Till it's gone

(Joni Mitchell)

More information about the aur-general mailing list