[aur-general] replying-on-thread issues (was AUR & Copyright)
ngoonee at gmail.com
Mon Feb 7 18:07:42 EST 2011
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 23:13 +0100, Nicky726 wrote:
> Dne Po 7. února 2011 16:31:22 Ng Oon-Ee napsal(a):
> > On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 14:03 +0000, Magnus Therning wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 13:49, Nicky726 <nicky726 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Could that be that I get Arch's mailing lists as diggests and reply to
> > > > them in the client and copy the subject of the particular message. Am
> > > > I supposed to do it in a different way? (Possibly with keeping the
> > > > messages delivered in a digest, not every separetely).
> > > > Now as this is a reply to a directly delivered message, it should fit
> > > > correctly. I didn't touch the subject field in this case at all.
> > > > Btw, thax you're trying to debug my issues.
> > >
> > > I don't usually subscribe in digest-mode, but I vaguely recall that
> > > there's a setting to get the digest in the form where each message is
> > > a MIME attachment to the digest message (if that makes sense). When I
> > > did that then my MUA, mutt, could open each attachment as an email and
> > > I could reply from that view, which resulted in the correct
> > > In-Reply-To and In-Relation-To values. I'm not a user of KMail myself
> > > so you'll have to experiment with it to see if it behaves the same way
> > > as mutt ;-)
> > >
> > > /M
> > On other MLs I'm on the general perception is that if you plan to reply,
> > please don't use digests. In other words, digest subscriptions should be
> > considered 'read-only', precisely because of the thread-breaking
> > behaviour.
> > Magnus' solution sounds nifty though, if you can get it working.
> Lets see now, if I got it working, KMail displays encapsulated messages and
> now I replied directly to yours.
Seems to work for me here on Evolution.
More information about the aur-general