[aur-general] Upgraded AUR to 1.8.0
archlinux at cryptocrack.de
Mon Feb 21 05:28:50 EST 2011
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:02:48AM +0100, Cédric Girard wrote:
> First congrats for all the improvements. This leads me to two questions:
> - It appears the "out of date" date is set to the same value for all
> packages marked out of date. I assume this is the intended behavior as the
> info was not stored anywhere, right?
Correct. All packages that were flagged during the upgrade have a
timestamp of "Mon, 21 Feb 2011 09:23:39 +0000" (that's the moment I ran
the database upgrade script).
> - What about the "submitter"? Was this info always known or is there some
> default in some cases? The thing is I have one package  I maintain where
> the submitter (Allan) is not credited. Should I consider this info as
> accurate and add the submitter to the contributor entries?
The submitter is the person who initially uploaded a package to the AUR.
That should be the first maintainer/contributor in most cases, but might
also be some Arch dev/TU who moved a package from [core], [extra] or
[community] to the AUR during some cleanup or whatever.
More information about the aur-general