[aur-general] TU Application - Seblu

Seblu seblu at seblu.net
Sun Jan 16 16:44:10 EST 2011

On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Lukas Fleischer
<archlinux at cryptocrack.de> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 09:55:09PM +0100, Seblu wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Jelle van der Waa <jelle at vdwaa.nl> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 21:37 +0100, Seblu wrote:
> awesome and cairo-xcb have been moved from [extra]/[community] to
> [unsupported] some months ago, check the related thread on
> arch-dev-public [1] and awesome AUR comments if you're interested in the
> reasons.
I am currently reading. Yes, it smells bad.

> I'm not sure what to do with mtr-cli. It provides the same functionality
> as mtr without the Gtk stuff, so I guess people are either supposed to
> build it using the ABS or use an AUR package. I'm not sure what we do
> with "flavoured" packages anyway. There are some of them in [community],
> like [2]. Furthermore, mtr-cli is currently maintained by Bluewind who's
> a TU.
> So even if we decide to move it, he'll probably maintain it
> himself.
Yes great. I'm not paid by package i maintain.
Do not misunderstand my intentions, this package is more often used
without gtk (subjective).
It's a really useful package for debugging network issues and got it
in a server is a plus.
Server => no gtk => no user repository packages. This was my reasoning.

But my plan was to propose to maintainer to maintain it in community.
If he don't have time, propose my services. If he don't want, never

> fstrim has only 3 votes. Any special reasons for still moving it to
> [community]?
If you see my comment on the package, fstrim will be included in next
release of util-linux-ng. So forget :)



Sébastien Luttringer

More information about the aur-general mailing list