[aur-general] TU Application - Seblu
bradfanella at archlinux.us
Mon Jan 17 00:16:58 EST 2011
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Martti Kühne <mysatyre at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:44:10PM +0100, Seblu wrote:
>>> Yes great. I'm not paid by package i maintain.
>>> Do not misunderstand my intentions, this package is more often used
>>> without gtk (subjective).
>>> It's a really useful package for debugging network issues and got it
>>> in a server is a plus.
>>> Server => no gtk => no user repository packages. This was my reasoning.
> I find this a really good idea, there is no reason for mtr to require
> X to be running. So I suggest moving mtr-gtk into aur and having a
> "sane" mtr package using the cli interface (on which ARCH users are so
> keen :-P -- ).
Why do you suggest that? Can't we have "mtr" (which is the CLI
version) and "mtr-gtk" in the repos? Just curious.
More information about the aur-general