[aur-general] mtr-cli (was: TU Application - Seblu)
ngoonee at gmail.com
Mon Jan 17 22:14:41 EST 2011
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 13:30 -0600, Brad Fanella wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:35 PM, dave reisner <d at falconindy.com> wrote:
> > I hate to do this, but I have to play devil's advocate here. This is
> > _exactly_ what's done for the vim/gvim package. The build directory is
> > _literally_ copied and the same package is built twice with extra options.
> > Why is it okay there but not here?
> > /me dodges incoming flames
> > dave
> No, no, you have an excellent point there. The vim/gvim split is an
> strong example, and quite frankly, I don't see where a problem arises
> in splitting the package.
Perhaps vim has a much larger user base?
More information about the aur-general