[aur-general] TU Application - Seblu

Seblu seblu at seblu.net
Fri Jan 21 13:48:07 EST 2011

On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Ionuț Bîru <biru.ionut at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 01/21/2011 08:04 PM, Seblu wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Ronald van Haren<pressh at gmail.com>
>>  wrote:
>> I see the point.
>> I would contact cairo debian maintainers about that. To have their
>> point of view.
> that means that you don't trust the arch maintainer judgment?
It looks like a trick question!
But if I want to be a good maintainer, I do understand the reasons.

and **The trust does not exclude the audit.**

> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465759#c23

I speak about this link previouly. But this bug does not inspire me confidence.
It is mainly based on the fact "Upstream is not unmaintained". And
this is not obvious.

Debian include awesome 3.4 in their distro. It does not seem to be
stupid to understand this choice!
As well as to understand why redhat do not.

Sébastien Luttringer

More information about the aur-general mailing list