[aur-general] Google-earth and bin32-google-earth

David Spicer azleifel at googlemail.com
Sun Mar 27 07:09:45 EDT 2011

I'm sitting here hoping that the current bin32- naming convention does 
not become deprecated, other than for some even better way of handling 
the situation where both 32-bit and 64-bit binaries are available and a 
package that installs the 32-bit binary on an x86_64 system is also useful.

On 26/03/11 16:12, Pierre-Antoine Vanpe wrote:
> I would also want to know about this for my utorrent package, They only provide
> a bin 32 binary but I decided to make only one package for both archs, should I
> create a bin32-utorrent-server package?
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43253

More information about the aur-general mailing list