[aur-general] Google-earth and bin32-google-earth
azleifel at googlemail.com
Sun Mar 27 07:09:45 EDT 2011
I'm sitting here hoping that the current bin32- naming convention does
not become deprecated, other than for some even better way of handling
the situation where both 32-bit and 64-bit binaries are available and a
package that installs the 32-bit binary on an x86_64 system is also useful.
On 26/03/11 16:12, Pierre-Antoine Vanpe wrote:
> I would also want to know about this for my utorrent package, They only provide
> a bin 32 binary but I decided to make only one package for both archs, should I
> create a bin32-utorrent-server package?
More information about the aur-general