[aur-general] tu bylaws update proposal

[Kaiting Chen]

On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Kaiting Chen <kaitocracy at gmail.com> wrote:

> Agreed; it's nice to have a single centralized document that delineates
> the procedure. I don't think that we should remove the eleventh point of
>
>
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/New_AUR_TU_guidelines#TODO_list_for_new_Trusted_Users
>
> however as it is perfectly conceivable for a TU to use a different key for
> their package signing. --Kaiting.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Ike Devolder <ike.devolder at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> after my own application and seeing it again i would like to propose an
>> update
>> to the TU Bylaws giving more information that the application should be
>> gpg
>> signed with the addidional publication of the public key.
>>
>> This would also imply we can remove the eleventh point of:
>>
>> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/New_AUR_TU_guidelines#TODO_list_for_new_Trusted_Users
>>
>> attached the patch for
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/trusted-user/TUbylaws.html
>>
>> --Ike
>
>
>
>
> --
> Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
>

Ahh sorry about the top post guys. A little inebriated after a long day of
work and I forgot about the standard here. --Kaiting.

-- 
Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/