[aur-general] PKGBUILD review request

Bernhard D bernhard.d at telering.at
Mon Apr 30 09:55:58 EDT 2012

Am Montag, den 30.04.2012, 16:00 +0300 schrieb Jesse Juhani Jaara:
> ma, 2012-04-30 kello 14:40 +0200, Bernhard D kirjoitti:
> > I attached the file I got from "makepkg --source" to my first message,
> > but it seems that it had been dropped. Are attachments allowed?
> No attachments are removed. Paste the PKGBUILD and .install file to some
> pastebin service. (Don't use pastebin.com!) Also Please do not top post,
> write your answer under the original message.
> > I split packaging for modules and firmware and patched
> > the sources to install the modules to /lib/modules/kernelversion/updates
> That is a wring directory. Out-of-tree modules go to
> /lib/modules/extramodules-$KERNEL_VERSION
> > Are the files under /lib/firmware/updates found and do they have
> > precedence?
> I am not completely sure about this but, I am quite positive that it
> doesn't matter in what directory the file is, as long it is in the
> firmware directory. I myself would use /lib/firmware/tbs/ directory.
> > > - Is "depmod -a" after install, upgrade and removal the right approach
> > > to rebuild the module dependencies?
> post_install()
> post_upgrade()
> and post_remove()
> are needed as far as I understand
> See the install file for vhba-module as reference
> https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/tree/trunk/vhba-module.install?h=packages/vhba-module

Thanks for your help. I have corrected the build process according to
your suggestions. The files can be found at:


More information about the aur-general mailing list