[aur-general] Which aur uploader is better, aurploader or burp?

郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) techlivezheng at gmail.com
Thu Feb 16 17:20:15 EST 2012

2012/2/17 Axilleas P <markeleas at gmail.com>:
> 2012/2/17 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) <techlivezheng at gmail.com>
>> I realize there are two AUR uploader helper, aurploader[1] and
>> burp[2]?Which one is you guys using? What's the pro and con?
>> Thank you
>> Techlive Zheng
>> [1]:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23393
>> [2]:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37216
> I haven't used aurploader but burp works perfect for me.
> It has all the options you need to upload to aur.
> I really like the config file where you put username/pass so that you don't
> have to type it every time.
> I just do a burp package.src.tar.gz and the job is done :)
> --
> (\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile
> (0.o ) to help him achieve world domination.
> (> <) come join the dark side.
> /_|_\ (we have cookies.)

I have just done some digging on two projects.

[bup][1] was initialed developing from May 13 2010 in github, since
then, it is in an active developing state till now.

[aurploader][2] just have one release on Sep 21 2010, and can not find
any vcs repo.

So, bup is better I think.


More information about the aur-general mailing list