[aur-general] Which aur uploader is better, aurploader or burp?

[Jesse Juhani Jaara]

perjantai, 17. helmikuuta 2012 15:01:47 SanskritFritz kirjoitti:
>-- I just do a
> 
> #!/usr/bin/fish
> makepkg --source
> burp (ls --sort=time *src.tar.gz | head -1)

Mayby this way..

#!/bin/sh
makepkg -S
burp $(source PKGBUILD; echo ${pkgname}-${pkgver}-${pkgrel}.src.tar.gz)

This absolutely sure we upload the same version as in PKGBUILD
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120217/83d833f9/attachment.asc>