[aur-general] Which aur uploader is better, aurploader or burp?

[Alireza Savand]

Now I'm convinced about using burp, i think/sure updating  numerous pkgs
is very usefull and somehow necessary.
And this is

#!/usr/bin/fish
> makepkg --source
> burp (ls --sort=time *src.tar.gz | head -1)


gorgeous :D



On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 6:01 PM, SanskritFritz <sanskritfritz at gmail.com>wrote:

> 2012/2/17 Cédric Girard <girard.cedric at gmail.com>:
> > 2012/2/17 Alireza Savand <alireza.savand at gmail.com>
> >
> >> For downloading yes of course it's nice to have one like yaourt, but for
> >> uploading it's little bit useless.
> >>
> >
> > No, it's really useful when you are updating your PKGBUILD on an headless
> > server.
>
> It *is* very useful. I maintain numerous aur packages, and using burp
> is very convenient. I just do a
>
> #!/usr/bin/fish
> makepkg --source
> burp (ls --sort=time *src.tar.gz | head -1)
>
> Previously I used aurploader (anything associated with Xyne is
> appealing since the times of bauerbill), but it forgot the
> user/password too quickly, so I tried burp, which fits my needs better
> in this regard. Both are great programs.
>