[aur-general] Deletion request - elilo-git

Massimiliano Torromeo massimiliano.torromeo at gmail.com
Mon Feb 20 03:14:37 EST 2012

On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Keshav P R <the.ridikulus.rat at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 20:34, Keshav P R <the.ridikulus.rat at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 19:50, Keshav P R <the.ridikulus.rat at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>     Please delete elilo-git
>>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45565 . It uses my own git
>>> mirror of upstram cvs repo as source (no elilo-cvs package). I have
>>> created elilo-x86_64 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56750
>>> to replace it, which uses upstream release tarballs. Thanks in
>>> advance.
>>> Regards.
>>> Keshav
>> Also delete grub-legacy-efi-fedora
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47979 , replaced by
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56751 .
>> - Keshav
> bump^2

The reason nobody is willing to do this is probably because your
package is obviously badly named (elilo-x86_64). There is no reason to
name the package so. If it is x86_64 only, just put only x86_64 in
arch=() instead of any, and just name the package "elilo".

If instead x86_64 is a build-only requirement, you should still name
the package as just "elilo" and leave the compile time check that you
did already put in place.

Either way I don't see a valid reason to name it elilo-x86_64, but if
you think we missed something, please clarify.


More information about the aur-general mailing list