[aur-general] Orphan request

[Ike Devolder]

Op zondag 15 juli 2012 22:31:33 schreef D. Can Celasun:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Ike Devolder <ike.devolder at gmail.com> 
wrote:
> > Op zondag 15 juli 2012 21:46:08 schreef D. Can Celasun:
> >> Wow, Déjà vu! In the past another TU asked me the exact same question
> >> and it was decided that if the maintainer didn't update any of his
> >> packages for a long time (e.g a year) the wait-2-weeks-for-response
> >> wasn't necessary. That particular discussion is here [1]. So I'd be
> >> glad if you could go ahead and orphan the packages.
> >> 
> >> Thanks!
> >> 
> >> [1]
> >> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-October/016307.ht
> >> ml
> >> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Ike Devolder <ike.devolder at gmail.com>
> > 
> > wrote:
> >> > Op zondag 15 juli 2012 21:36:16 schreef D. Can Celasun:
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >> 
> >> >> Can someone please orphan rabbitvcs-thunar [1] and thunarx-python[2] ?
> >> >> The maintainer hasn't updated any of his packages in over a year and
> >> >> there are updated PKGBUILDs in the comments. I'd like to maintain
> >> >> them.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Thanks.
> >> >> 
> >> >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34590
> >> >> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34589
> >> > 
> >> > Did you email the current maintainer ?
> >> > If he/she does not respond in two weeks we can orphan [1].
> >> > 
> >> > [1]
> >> > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR#Q:_Foo_in_AUR_is_outdated.3B_w
> >> > hat
> >> > _do_I_do.3F
> >> > 
> >> > thx
> >> > 
> >> > --Ike
> > 
> > This thing about the long not updated packages was never written down, so
> > that is why you get this question again.
> > now i have updated the wiki so this is known for more than you alone. i
> > cant remember everything that ever happened in the mailinglist.
> > 
> > so maybe you could also notify in the mail that we are talking about long
> > marked packages this makes it easier for us to make a decision.
> > 
> > and at last, orphaned both. thx
> > 
> > --Ike
> 
> Thanks for orphaning.
> 
> Also, I'm sorry if my response seemed, well, aggressive. That was
> certainly not my intention.
> 
> Cheers,
> Can

i can understand if you got this question before and went through a discussion 
before you don't want to get this question again.
no hard feelings :)

--Ike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120715/946fecf8/attachment.asc>