[aur-general] AUR and unsuported architectures

[Hugo Osvaldo Barrera]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2012-06-03 20:44, Martti Kühne wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 01:38:01AM +0200, Martti Kühne wrote:
> 
>> What about a modded aur client, I could write a patch to about
>> any given aur helper within minutes that would add the arch to
>> the PKGBUILD after download, which would simply add/enforce the
>> desired arch.
> 
> Excuse my inability to ignore the mess in that sentence.
> 
>> What about a modded aur client, I could write a patch to about
>> any given aur helper within minutes that would modify the
>> PKGUBILD after download, and add/enforce the desired arch, giving
>> it a shot in the dark.
> 
> ...Also, one would find out soon enough if modifications are
> needed.
> 
> cheers! mar77i

But that would simply add "arm" or "ppc" to the ARCH array.  The point
is to know beforehand if the package works - currently I can know if a
package works or not in my arch (amd64) by looking at the PKGBUILD.
That's the whole point of that array.

- -- 
Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPy/jFAAoJEIc88gcb++1EWz4H/iJ5gbJLFzK0vrQMeKhOu1H3
V4RPlyzrEOezt3ZV4LX7GWoKcgjIkWR8GR31KSsDoOlPgsy/ejsAw6D0GiUpHhly
DG924wFkYOrPUIYuacIFnEZGwLiTh9zObCPe2tQEczW4OGM5I4tvkyXB4YqtNu0v
8YA+DwMo3+mzX1a2MHx2jjVHYsbKWXapR9SEe4tG7O8Cl1QssIQEkwMneheeeuXt
h+ZuwGIWjL8E8r99cvCQDdJ6SWUdDQAjVtGnS1cOKauWsNxyqbCGRZRs8ln6pErP
H10ya8lGjwgHMcTVeqC1/mraEuzIO8oZWFloMqahh0on8Dvg6wFO5GBjl6kwTPA=
=Br/F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----