[aur-general] Removal request: virtualbox-sun

Seblu seblu at seblu.net
Mon Mar 26 17:39:19 EDT 2012

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Det <nimetonmaili at gmail.com> wrote:
> I guess this is a good summary of all the talk in virtualbox-sun's comment
> section[1].
> The reality here is that virtualbox-bin[2] has evolved into something _at
> least_ as good as virtualbox-sun.

> While it's true that -sun is the original one it's also the one with the incorrect naming
If i remember correctly first was virtualbox_bin[1] (which was
renammed into virtualbox-bin last year).

> Even if -sun was to stay here the "better" stuff in -bin would have to be
> implemented there first before the removal and the renaming.
I don't understand your sentence. Is there something missing in -bin
that you need?

I remind everyone is encouraged to use the version in the official

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?O=0&K=virtualbox_bin
[2] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/virtualbox/

Sébastien Luttringer

More information about the aur-general mailing list