[aur-general] Removal request: virtualbox-sun
seblu at seblu.net
Mon Mar 26 17:39:19 EDT 2012
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Det <nimetonmaili at gmail.com> wrote:
> I guess this is a good summary of all the talk in virtualbox-sun's comment
> The reality here is that virtualbox-bin has evolved into something _at
> least_ as good as virtualbox-sun.
> While it's true that -sun is the original one it's also the one with the incorrect naming
If i remember correctly first was virtualbox_bin (which was
renammed into virtualbox-bin last year).
> Even if -sun was to stay here the "better" stuff in -bin would have to be
> implemented there first before the removal and the renaming.
I don't understand your sentence. Is there something missing in -bin
that you need?
I remind everyone is encouraged to use the version in the official
More information about the aur-general