[aur-general] Not the way to go: teamviewer and teamviewer-stable

[Andrea Scarpino]

On Monday 28 May 2012 20:57:58 Christian Stadegaart wrote:
> In my opinion, if Hilinus isn't maintaining properly, the package should 
> be orphaned and then maintained by someone else, perhaps tlm. There 
> probably is a standard protocol for these kind of issues.

Someone flagged the package as out-of-date at 13:34 GMT[1], and 20 minutes 
later tlm uploaded the new one.
We should probably delete tlm's package[2] instead.

[1] "This package has been flagged out of date. (Mon, 28 May 2012 13:34:02 
+0000)" https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36481

[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59577

-- 
Andrea