[aur-general] Merge request: teamspeak/teamspeak3

Malte Rabenseifner mail at malte-rabenseifner.de
Sun Oct 14 07:00:51 EDT 2012


On 14.10.2012 10:21, Ike Devolder wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 07:02:59AM +0200, Frederik "Freso" S. Olesen wrote:
>> Den 17-09-2012 07:07, Ike Devolder skrev:
>>> Op maandag 17 september 2012 00:51:56 schreef Frederik Freso S. Olesen:
>>>> I'd like to request the merging of teamspeak3[1] and teamspeak[2].
>>>>
>> <zip>
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33023
>>>> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61431
>>>
>>> since you are not the maintainer of either of these packages i would like to
>>> see an agreement of both maintainers.
>>>
>>> so jwbirdsong and Sabaku, do you agree with a merge, and agree who will
>>> maintain this merged package. and please reply to the mailinglist.
>>
>> jwbirdsong has returned, somewhat, and updated his package. It's been almost
>> a month since this mail was sent out, and, to my knowledge, neither of the
>> two replied to the merge inquiry. How to proceed from here?
>>
>> I'd say that teamspeak3 is the more mature and well-maintained of the two,
>> so merging teamspeak into that would work. I still personally believe that
>> "teamspeak" is the better namespace though, as long as teamspeak3 is the
>> latest version of TeamSpeak. :)
>>
>> --
>> Namasté,
>> Frederik "Freso" S. Olesen <http://freso.dk/>
>
> i'll mail both maintainers personally and see how to proceed
>
> thx
>

Hi,

I am the maintainer of "teamspeak3-server". As upstream uses 
"teamspeak3*" or "ts3*" in most of the file- and pathnames I would like 
to keep "teamspeak3-server". Maybe that would be a point to have 
"teamspeak3" as client package for unity.
However I see no reason to stick with "teamspeak3-server" if nuking the 
3 is what is decided here. Just post the result here. =)

-- 
Malte Rabenseifner
mail at malte-rabenseifner.de



More information about the aur-general mailing list