[aur-general] Copy.com dueling packages

[Limao Luo]

On 04/02/2013 11:59 AM, Jonathan Arnold wrote:
> There are 2 packages for the Copy.com client software package:
>
> copy - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy/
> copy-agent - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy-agent/
>
> I think both have PKGBUILD problems, from dependencies (the Copy.com
> software uses Qt4, not Gtk, for instance) to poorly formed PKGBUILDs
> (one has just a package() method and one has just a build() method).
> I'm not really sure how this should be resolved, mostly because I
> wouldn't pick one over the other right now.
>
> Any one with more PKGBUILD confidence want to step in?
>
> Also, if you're interested, sign up with this link and we both get an
> extra 5gb(!) of cloud storage on copy.com:
>
> https://copy.com?r=NXWnIn
>
Here's a git repo of all the source files after fixing them up: 
https://github.com/luolimao/PKGBUILDs/tree/copy-agent/copy-agent