[aur-general] Copy.com dueling packages
luolimao at gmail.com
Tue Apr 2 22:56:13 EDT 2013
On 04/02/2013 10:54 PM, Limao Luo wrote:
> On 04/02/2013 11:59 AM, Jonathan Arnold wrote:
>> There are 2 packages for the Copy.com client software package:
>> copy - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy/
>> copy-agent - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy-agent/
>> I think both have PKGBUILD problems, from dependencies (the Copy.com
>> software uses Qt4, not Gtk, for instance) to poorly formed PKGBUILDs
>> (one has just a package() method and one has just a build() method).
>> I'm not really sure how this should be resolved, mostly because I
>> wouldn't pick one over the other right now.
>> Any one with more PKGBUILD confidence want to step in?
>> Also, if you're interested, sign up with this link and we both get an
>> extra 5gb(!) of cloud storage on copy.com:
> Here's a git repo of all the source files after fixing them up:
By the way, I think copy-agent is a better name in this case, but it's
up to the maintainers, I guess.
More information about the aur-general