[aur-general] TUs and their following of the Bylaws

Sébastien Luttringer seblu at seblu.net
Wed Aug 7 10:52:55 EDT 2013

On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Xyne <xyne at archlinux.ca> wrote:
> Angel Velásquez wrote:
>>Supa easy, open the TU panel at the AUR, check who voted and who didn't
>>on the lasts SVP (the last three or more if you want) .. make some
>>decision about it, yeah we made the quorum but still, what about these
>>people that is marked as active, do packaging stuff but are working
>>isolated of the team? (seems to don't care about who we add or who we
>>After "stirring the pot" as somebody said to me, I consider that doing
>>patches for the AUR is good, in order to make everybody aware and have
>>no excuses for everyone.
>>Let's see what's happens on the next SVP ;).
> After my previous reply I spent a little time thinking about the current bylaws
> and our notions of activity. I have posted a message to the list with a
> modified version of the bylaws to begin a discussion (i.e. the version I have
> sent is not a final proposal).
There is currently a discussion around amending the by-laws started by Lukas.
Maybe you could join us instead of restarting a thread?


Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer
GPG: 0x2072D77A

More information about the aur-general mailing list