[aur-general] Icons pack naming guidelines
undeterminant at gmail.com
Sat Jun 29 15:07:57 EDT 2013
I think that we should modify the convention so that it goes as
icon-theme-*, gtk-theme-*, etc. so that it sorts better.
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Agustin Ferrario <
agustin.ferrario at hotmail.com.ar> wrote:
> On Fri 28 Jun 2013 09:52:23 AM ART, Maxime Gauduin wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 10:44 +0200, Edoardo Maria Elidoro wrote:
> >> Hi everyone,
> >> I was wondering why a lot of icon themes in AUR have this "kind" of
> >> name: $name-icon-theme.
> >> I think it should be better if the guidelines would encourage a
> >> cleaner (and IMHO better) format like: icon-theme-$name, just like the
> >> gtk-themes in AUR.
> >> What do you think?
> >> Maybe the guidelines already suggest something like this, I'm just
> >> asking since I found A LOT of packages with that "kind" of name.
> >> Have a nice day,
> >> Edoardo
> > *-icon-theme seems to be the convention right now, but there is no
> > guideline about this afaik. icon-theme-* might be a good idea, but we
> > already have gnome-icon-theme, humanity-icon-theme and the likes in our
> > repos. Unless you want to go on a crusade to change all the icon theme
> > packages, I'd leave it at that, seems like too much wasted energy to me.
> > Cheers,
> > --
> > Maxime
> I think we should write it in the Arch Packaging Standards so they all
> use the same convention
More information about the aur-general