[aur-general] Removal/Renaming Request
Ronnie Andrew Magatti Lucas Silva
ronnieandrew92 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 24 17:03:42 EDT 2013
Yes, wxpython-devel would be even better.
Oh, i didn't know that.
I'll upload the new package.
2013/10/24 Doug Newgard <scimmia22 at outlook.com>
> > Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:43:51 -0400
> > From: jdarnold at buddydog.org
> > To: aur-general at archlinux.org
> > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Removal/Renaming Request
> > On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:18:18 -0002
> > Ronnie Andrew <ronnieandrew92 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I'm the new maintainer of the package: wxpython
> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wxpython-220.127.116.11/
> >> This package should be renamed from "wxpython-18.104.22.168" to
> >> "wxpython-updates" since its the development version of wxpython and
> >> submitting a new package for each version would not be ideal.
> >> Also, i mistakenly submitted a new package trying to update wxpython
> >> to a new version which should be deleted.
> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wxpython22.214.171.124/
> > Actually, there already is a wxpython in extra that does all this. It
> > should be marked out of date, I would think.
> > --
> > Jonathan Arnold Webstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io
> > If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, you
> > need a team ~ John Wooden
> No, the package in extra is the stable version, the AUR one is the
> unstable development version.
> IMO, it should be wxpython-devel to keep with the accepted naming scheme.
> Ronnie, you need to upload the new package to the AUR then a TU can merge
> the old package into it. They cannot rename a package.
*Tecnologia em Análise e Desenvolvimento de Sistemas*
*UNICAMP - FT*
More information about the aur-general