[aur-general] Move vagrant to [community]?
ido at kernel.org
Fri Feb 21 13:32:11 EST 2014
The official distribution is the RPM/DEB/binary distribution. The
ruby-vagrant package is different - I don't believe it is based on
vagrant-installers. If we wanted to not use the RPMs (which are very
self-contained) but still have a low-maintenance way of packaging this, we
could start here: https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant-installers
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Anatol Pomozov
<anatol.pomozov at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Ido Rosen <ido at kernel.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I maintain vagrant package in AUR. I believe vagrant is a very useful
> > for ArchLinux users. I am happy to continue maintaining it in AUR;
> > however, for the good of the community, it would be great if one of you
> > could move vagrant into [community] as soon as possible so it could get
> > wider exposure. It currently has ~147 votes. Releases are infrequent,
> > it has been very easy to maintain overall.
> > AUR package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vagrant/
> > Upstream distribution website: http://www.vagrantup.com/
> > Also, if you'd like to make changes to the PKGBUILD in AUR, you can
> > a pull request on GitHub: https://github.com/ido/packages-archlinux (under
> > the aur/vagrant directory).
> I see that it uses *.rpm file as a source. Does this project have source
> Is ruby-vagrant aur package (built from sources) the same as your package?
More information about the aur-general