[aur-general] Move vagrant to [community]?
ido at kernel.org
Fri Feb 21 13:33:31 EST 2014
Also, the source repo for vagrant itself is
https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant ... but I think the RPMs and other
packaging is generated by https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant-installers
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Ido Rosen <ido at kernel.org> wrote:
> The official distribution is the RPM/DEB/binary distribution. The
> ruby-vagrant package is different - I don't believe it is based on
> vagrant-installers. If we wanted to not use the RPMs (which are very
> self-contained) but still have a low-maintenance way of packaging this, we
> could start here: https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant-installers
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Anatol Pomozov <anatol.pomozov at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Ido Rosen <ido at kernel.org> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > I maintain vagrant package in AUR. I believe vagrant is a very useful
>> > for ArchLinux users. I am happy to continue maintaining it in AUR;
>> > however, for the good of the community, it would be great if one of you
>> > could move vagrant into [community] as soon as possible so it could get
>> > wider exposure. It currently has ~147 votes. Releases are infrequent,
>> > it has been very easy to maintain overall.
>> > AUR package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vagrant/
>> > Upstream distribution website: http://www.vagrantup.com/
>> > Also, if you'd like to make changes to the PKGBUILD in AUR, you can
>> > a pull request on GitHub: https://github.com/ido/packages-archlinux (under
>> > the aur/vagrant directory).
>> I see that it uses *.rpm file as a source. Does this project have source
>> Is ruby-vagrant aur package (built from sources) the same as your package?
More information about the aur-general