[aur-general] AUR 3.3.0 released

[Lukas Fleischer]

On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 at 09:56:18, Attila Bukor wrote:
> On 07/08/2014 06:27 PM, Steven Honeyman wrote:
> > The trouble is there are too many people that don't (or can't) think
> > about *why* something might not be working. It's often the users'
> > fault :)
> >
> > Suppose someone sets ld.gold as their default linker "because the
> > internet told them it was better"... and then tries to compile
> > imagemagick...
> >
> >
> > Steven.
> 
> What if it would be a vote-like structure and one reporter wouldn't be
> enough to flag it as not working?
> 

Dan suggested something similar some time ago [1] and I quite like that
idea. One "Mark package broken" button and an option to sort package
search results by the number of users that marked a package.

> r1pp3rj4ck
> 
> 
> 

[1] http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2011-June/001698.html