[aur-general] package blacklist?

[Johannes Löthberg]

On 30/06, Mike Hobbs wrote:
>Yeah, but AFAIK that's necessary, though, in order to replace 
>xorg-server with a patched version. At least that's the convention 
>that seen elsewhere with other AUR packages that contain bug fixes.
>

No, the pkgbase should be something else and your package should 
conflict/replace the repo one.

-- 
Sincerely,
  Johannes Löthberg
  PGP Key ID: 3A9D0BB5
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1530 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20140630/22212fdc/attachment.asc>