[aur-general] package blacklist?

[Mike Hobbs]

On 06/30/2014 12:40 PM, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
> On 30/06, Mike Hobbs wrote:
>> Yeah, but AFAIK that's necessary, though, in order to replace 
>> xorg-server with a patched version. At least that's the convention 
>> that seen elsewhere with other AUR packages that contain bug fixes.
>>
>
> No, the pkgbase should be something else and your package should 
> conflict/replace the repo one.
>

Maybe I misunderstood then. I assumed that everything else that depends 
on xorg-server being present would then break. I'll give it a try...

Thanks,
- Mike