[aur-general] package blacklist?
mhobbs at fluid.com
Mon Jun 30 13:42:31 EDT 2014
On 06/30/2014 12:40 PM, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
> On 30/06, Mike Hobbs wrote:
>> Yeah, but AFAIK that's necessary, though, in order to replace
>> xorg-server with a patched version. At least that's the convention
>> that seen elsewhere with other AUR packages that contain bug fixes.
> No, the pkgbase should be something else and your package should
> conflict/replace the repo one.
Maybe I misunderstood then. I assumed that everything else that depends
on xorg-server being present would then break. I'll give it a try...
More information about the aur-general