[aur-general] Move vagrant and ceph to [community]?

Sébastien Luttringer seblu at seblu.net
Fri Mar 7 12:09:11 EST 2014

On 07/03/2014 17:26, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
> -1 for ceph, I experienced data loss last time I tried it on a small
> test-cluster. (Reported a bug. It's probably fixed now, but I still
> don't trust it).

I support adding Ceph. There are professional appliances based on Ceph.
We have a cluster running (in my company) since one year and we didn't
have lost any data.

Here, using it in production is not the point. Having Ceph in community
would help to test and use remote cluster from Arch. So, +1.


Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer
https://seblu.net | Twitter: @seblu42
GPG: 0x2072D77A

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20140307/6e23f8bf/attachment.asc>

More information about the aur-general mailing list