[aur-general] Move vagrant and ceph to [community]?
seblu at seblu.net
Fri Mar 7 12:09:11 EST 2014
On 07/03/2014 17:26, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
> -1 for ceph, I experienced data loss last time I tried it on a small
> test-cluster. (Reported a bug. It's probably fixed now, but I still
> don't trust it).
I support adding Ceph. There are professional appliances based on Ceph.
We have a cluster running (in my company) since one year and we didn't
have lost any data.
Here, using it in production is not the point. Having Ceph in community
would help to test and use remote cluster from Arch. So, +1.
Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer
https://seblu.net | Twitter: @seblu42
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the aur-general