[aur-general] Disown request

Felix Yan felixonmars at gmail.com
Tue Mar 11 09:12:45 EDT 2014

On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 12:54:05 James Bulmer wrote:
> Hi.
> Earlier today I put a request in to disown python2-routes, I now
> need python2-repoze-lru which is a dependency of python2-routes. It had the
> same owner and is the same situation of not being updated in the last 2
> years.
> Thanks again
> -- James

Actually I prefer "python2-repoze.lru" as the naming scheme, since it follows 
upstream, and most repoze packages in the AUR are named in this way (python2-
repoze-lru being the only exception).

So I'll suggest to merge python2-repoze-lru into python2-repoze.lru, and 
disown python2-repoze.lru which didn't update for even longer, and the 
maintainer has half of his packages out-of-date.

What do you think?

Felix Yan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20140311/4a67b3ec/attachment.asc>

More information about the aur-general mailing list