[aur-general] Disown request

[James Bulmer]

Awesome,

so if you disown python2-repoze.lru, I will update the package and deploy
(after lunch). Then we can disown / delete python2-repoze-lru once the new
python2-routes has been deployed

Sound like a plan?


On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Felix Yan <felixonmars at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 12:54:05 James Bulmer wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Earlier today I put a request in to disown python2-routes, I now
> > need python2-repoze-lru which is a dependency of python2-routes. It had
> the
> > same owner and is the same situation of not being updated in the last 2
> > years.
> >
> > Thanks again
> > -- James
>
> Actually I prefer "python2-repoze.lru" as the naming scheme, since it
> follows
> upstream, and most repoze packages in the AUR are named in this way
> (python2-
> repoze-lru being the only exception).
>
> So I'll suggest to merge python2-repoze-lru into python2-repoze.lru, and
> disown python2-repoze.lru which didn't update for even longer, and the
> maintainer has half of his packages out-of-date.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Regards,
> Felix Yan